Monday, 26 October 2009

Once Upon A Time In America

I bought this on DVD the other day and having now watched it felt compelled to write something as it’s the best film I’ve seen in a while.  There are spoilers in what follows, so don’t read this if you haven’t seen it and plan on watching it.

Once Upon A Time in America is a truly epic movie, not just because it’s almost 4 hours long but because it is one spectacular work of cinematic art.  Directed by Sergio Leone, who spent years making this film happen, it is a story of gangland America set over a period of 40 years or more from the prohibition era of the 1920s and early 1930s through to the late 1960s.

onceuponatime 
Influenced by the novel The Hoods, written by Harry Grey, the tale is told through a series of flashbacks and flashforwards between the eras.  Stories that are told in this manner and span whole lifetimes can give the viewer a powerful sense of realisation and wonder as the ways in which events, people and lives piece together become apparent.  Done really effectively, as is the case with Once Upon A Time In America, it can give a sense not dissimilar to nostalgia as you watch characters visit their old haunts and observe how times and people have changed or stood still.

Director Sergio Leone assembled a brilliant cast, with Robert DeNiro, James Woods, Elizabeth McGovern and a young Jennifer Connelly in her first feature film role to name but a few.  The sets and locations are equally impressive, giving an authentic portrayal of early 20th century New York.

The protagonist is David “Noodles” Aaronson, played by DeNiro in the 1930s and 1960s scenes and by an unknown (to me anyway) actor for his childhood years.  He and his gang of street kids survive through small time crime, but following an altercation which results in rival “hood” Bugsy getting stabbed to death, Noodles is incarcerated for 12 years. We see nothing of his time in jail and the story picks up again with his release, by which time his old gang have risen to power in the criminal underworld of the prohibition era.

The film actually begins at this point in the 1930s with the killing of Noodles’ gang, before flashing back to events of the preceding days.  So even within the 1930s era the events are not played out in chronological order.

We then flash forward to the 1960s with Noodles, who has been living in self-imposed exile, returning to New York for the first time in over 30 years.

deniro

It may sound confusing but it’s easy to follow because the way in which the actors are aged between the 1930s scenes to the 1960s scenes is very well executed, particularly in the case of Robert DeNiro.  The transition between these eras is also handled brilliantly.  For example, as we move between the 1930s and the 1960s, we see Noodles leaving from and returning to the same bus station in one seamless scene, with a change in music (to The Beatles’ Yesterday) and of course DeNiro’s makeup signifying the change.  The characters in the 1920s and earlier are played by an excellent ensemble of young actors, who look enough like their adult counterparts to be believable and easily recognisable.

Due to the length of the film, the original US release was heavily cut, dispensing with the flashback/flashforward format and instead relaying events in chronological order. Having seen how effective the full release is, this trimmed down version must have been far less impressive and indeed it was a critical and box office flop.

There is one exception to the brilliant contrast between the eras and that is the character of Deborah as an adult, played by Elizabeth McGovern, who appears to have received very little attention from the effects department and looks almost exactly the same in the 1960s as she does in the 1930s.  This is confusing, as such as brilliant job was done in all other aspects, particularly as Jennifer Connelly who plays the young Deborah bears a convincing resemblance to Elizabeth McGovern.  Upon reading IMDB though, one theory suggests that this is in fact intentional and lends credence to an alternative interpretation of the whole story.  I won’t reveal anything further, but you can read it for yourself amongst the trivia in the IMDB entry for this film.

deborah

There are a couple of scenes throughout the film that some people may find uncomfortable.  As well as some quite graphic killings and beatings, Noodles rapes two women which you might expect would alienate the audience from the character; yet somehow it doesn’t, perhaps because of the exact circumstances, perhaps because of the way in which it is handled and perhaps because of the fact that Noodles basically comes across as a decent guy in spite of everything he does.  At least the film doesn’t pussyfoot around these issues and succeeds in creating a believable portrayal of the era.

The ending of the film is ambiguous, both in terms of the final scene in the 1960s and the actual final scene of the film, which is set in the 1930s.  There are a few unanswered questions, such as did Max jump in to the garbage truck, or was it just a smokescreen for another elaborate disappearing act?  And, more importantly, why does Noodles have a big grin on his face at the end of the film?  At this point (in the 1930s) it’s either just after he’s learned of his gang’s death, or just after he’s informed the police of their plans. Either way, despite the fact he’s high on opiates, would he be grinning?  Perhaps this also supports the alternative interpretation of the story.

Also what remains unexplained is what Noodles has done with his life in the years between 1933 and the late 60s.  When asked that very question by Fat Moe, he replies simply “Going to bed early”!  It is actually testament to the effective script and story that, despite the length and depth of this film, it still leaves the viewer to imagine and ponder these details.

This review would not be complete without mentioning something of the score.  The music was composed by Ennio Morricone who produced the soundtracks for a number of Leone’s films.  His work here is excellent and fits the period very well, with a gentleness to the melodies that helps the viewer to sympathise with the characters.  There is a sort of theme tune, for want of a better description, that runs throughout and in one scene the young gang are heard whistling it as they attempt to look innocent while preparing for mischief.

street

As well as Morricone’s score, the film uses several other pieces of existing music.  Rossini’s The Thieving Magpie is very fitting during a baby-switching scene in a hospital and other recognisable pieces include God Bless America and Lennon and McCartney’s Yesterday which I mentioned earlier.

In summary, Once Upon A Time In America is one of those films that should be on any film enthusiast’s list of essential viewing.  Just make sure that you see the full-length version to appreciate this masterpiece as it was intended.  The Warner Home Video 2 disc special edition will have pride of place in my DVD collection for many years to come.

Friday, 23 October 2009

Windows 7

My copy of Windows 7 arrived yesterday afternoon, so I decided to waste some time this morning installing and playing with it.

The Package

Thankfully Tesco had used CityLink to deliver it, so no worries about it getting caught up in the current Royal Mail industrial action.  It came in a stupidly large ‘envelope’:100_3209

Inside was the full retail version of Windows 7 Home Premium, which now costs twice what I paid for it on pre-order :)  I only wish I’d bought several of them…

100_3204 100_3206

Both 32-bit and 64-bit editions are included on separate DVDs.  I decided to install the 32-bit version because I don’t think I would currently benefit from using the 64-bit version.  With 4Gb RAM and only 3.25Gb available to a 32-bit OS, I could have reclaimed the extra 768Mb but the additional overhead of 64-bits would more than wipe that out anyway.

Installation

I installed it to a separate 500Gb hard disk, leaving XP on the other disk so I can simply choose which OS to boot using the BIOS boot menu.  In any case, Windows 7 won’t do an in-place upgrade from XP; you have to back-up all your data, do a fresh install and then use Windows Easy Transfer to restore your files and settings if you want to completely replace your old OS.

Installation was seriously quick – it took only 19 minutes!  This has to be faster than any version of Windows on the same hardware. All my hardware worked out of the box with the exception of an ancient Canon BJC-250 inkjet printer.  To get this working, I downloaded the last driver Canon made, which was for 2000/XP, and ran the installer in XP compatibility mode.  This worked fine and I can now print.  Nothing new here though, as this trick would have worked in Vista as well.

Performance

Windows 7 boots up pretty quickly, but then it is installed onto an empty drive.  This drive is also a newer generation and therefore a bit quicker (by up to 20Mb/sec) than my other 500Gb drive which has XP on it.  From the end of POST to the login prompt takes 29 seconds, with a further 4 seconds after logging on before the Start menu (now the Windows blob) is available.

By comparison, XP boots up in 22 seconds to the login box, but after logging on there’s a delay of 12 seconds before the Start menu is available.  It is still loading system tray programs at this point though.

It’s difficult to make a comparison as XP has all my programs installed whereas 7 is a clean install apart from AVG Antivirus.  Overall it’s likely that 7 is faster to boot up than Vista, but roughly the same as XP.

It certainly shuts down more quickly though, taking around 14 seconds to switch off compared to a good half a minute for XP.

Cool Features

If you’ve already used Vista then the interface is very similar.  Aero has been updated to include some new effects/features.  Aero Snap is probably the most useful, where dragging a window to the far left or far right of the screen causes the window to fill that half of the screen.  This is great for placing two documents/web pages side by side so you can compare them.

One or two other things immediately stand out as particularly useful. The first is the addition of recent file lists for individual applications.  Click the arrow to the right of them in the Start menu and you get a list of recent files used in that app.  Very handy indeed.

recent_files

Next, system tray icons are customisable.  You can show only notifications, hiding icons that aren’t displaying anything useful, or completely hide icons that you’re not interested in.

Omissions

Quick Launch has gone, which is bizarre as it’s an extremely useful way of putting shortcuts to frequently used things on the taskbar.  Luckily I found a way to put it back.  Quick Launch lives in

%userprofile%\AppData\Roaming\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Quick Launch

All you have to do is right-click on the taskbar and choose Toolbars –> New Toolbar and you can pick the Quick Launch folder above.  Then you can fiddle with the settings to get rid of the title and text captions, unlock the taskbar and drag the pinned programs over to the right so that Quick Launch is back where it belongs at the left.

There’s a couple of things you won’t necessarily need in Quick Launch any more and those are Internet Explorer (which is now pinned to the taskbar by default) and the Show Desktop feature (which can now be accessed at the far right of the taskbar).

Rather than use Quick Launch, you could just pin everything you use frequently to the taskbar.  However, there’s two reasons why this doesn’t work for me.  The first is that the icons just take up too much space, whereas Quick Launch icons are tiny.  Secondly, it just doesn’t work for “My Computer”.  No amount of pinning would get it to stay there and I like to be able to access hard disks / removable drives quickly via My Computer.

Another fairly significant omission is Windows Mail.  This has been removed completely, but you can download a new version from Windows Live Essentials.  This is accessible on the Start menu under Getting Started.

The new version, called Windows Live Mail, seems to do everything Windows Mail in Vista did, but it does look rather bleak:

windows_mail 
There’s a severe lack of any icons/graphics and I find the absence of the File/Edit/etc menus as annoying as their absence from the Office 2007 apps, although they are at least accessible by pressing ALT.

One huge bonus though is that your account usernames are now remembered.  With Windows Mail on Vista, unless you entered both username and password it would not save them for next time.  I like to have the username saved, but still have to enter the password each time the program is started.

Windows Live Essentials also contains a useful freebie called Windows Live Writer.  This is a WYSIWYG blog editor app which allows you to submit to various blogging services including Blogger. 

windows_writer 
You can save local drafts while composing your entries, which is far more reassuring than working directly in a browser.  There doesn’t seem to be any way to save your submissions to somewhere offline though, apart from changing to the source window and manually copying & pasting everything out into an HTML file.

Conclusion

Windows 7 is a decent OS.  It’s fast, looks nice and has some useful features.  At the discounted pre-order price it was a real bargain, but at full price it doesn’t necessarily represent such good value.  If you have a fast PC and already have Vista, it’s only a minor upgrade.  It is probably more relevant for people who finally want to replace their ageing XP, or when buying a new PC of course.  I’m sticking with Vista on my laptop as I’ve never had any complaints with it, but 7 is a worthwhile update for an XP desktop.